Bluetooth low energy communicates on the 2.4 GHz spectrum, achieving bit rates of 125 to 2000 kilobits per second, and is primarily used for data transfer. Designed into the majority of connected devices sold today, Bluetooth low energy offers a low-power communication channel to connect sensors, switches, and appliances to smartphones or, via a gateway, to the internet. When it comes to name recognition, Bluetooth clearly comes out on top. In this blog, we shed some light on what the two technologies have in common, what sets them apart, and how they can complement each other in smart home deployments. So, if Bluetooth low energy and Thread serve a similar purpose, which of the two should smart home solution developers manufacturing devices and end users shopping for them for their homes opt for? As such, they need a local gateway to access the internet. Among the panoply of technologies tossed around when discussing smart homes are Bluetooth® low energy and Thread.īluetooth low energy and Thread are both short range communication technologies. After being identified by your connected domestic alarm system and let in by your smart lock, an occupancy monitor might adjust the blinds, control the lighting, and set the air conditioning to your liking, as your smart fridge senses the amount of milk consumed and, if necessary, adds a note to stock up on more on your smartphone app.Īll that before you even ask your voice assistant to play you a podcast.Īs connected alarm panels, locks, lighting, heating, and ventilation systems move from the margins to the mainstream, efforts are underway to align the wireless communication technologies, protocols, and standards they depend on to promote interoperability across manufacturers, simplifying adoption. Imagine entering your home, walking through hall to your kitchen, opening the fridge, and pouring yourself a glass of milk.

There are a million reasons why smart home technology is on the rise.

Wifi vs bluetooth smart light